I'd like to see
comics and
cartoons about ...


No need to add
comics or cartoons
to your keywords!

Advanced Search
Know the
image number?


Find
comics and cartoons
for:

Books
Magazines
Newsletters
Presentations
Websites

 

Find Cartoons by: Cartoonist I
Advanced Search I Keyword(s)


Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons

Comics and cartoons about they .

These are available for you to license for books, magazines, newsletters, presentations and websites.
Roll-over each thumbnail and click on the image that appears to see links for licensing.
Questions? Please let us know.

View results from all properties Refine Search View Related Subjects

Result page:     (13 images)


1. Cartoonist Ann Telnaes  Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons 2017-08-22 they 
Cartoonist(s): Ann Telnaes
Comic/Cartoon: Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2017-08-22 Pub. Date: 2017-08-22
Image Number: 161988
Caption: No caption (Donald Trump Jr. pushes a wheel barrow full of bags of money with Eric Trump sitting on top. They are surrounded by Secret Service agents).
     
2. Cartoonist Ann Telnaes  Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons 2016-10-31 they 
Cartoonist(s): Ann Telnaes
Comic/Cartoon: Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2016-10-31 Pub. Date: 2016-10-31
Image Number: 150660
Caption: Dear Congress: We found more emails. They "appear to be pertinent" and we "cannot yet assess whether the material may or may not be significant."
     
3. Cartoonist Ann Telnaes  Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons 2016-05-01 they 
Cartoonist(s): Ann Telnaes
Comic/Cartoon: Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2016-05-01 Pub. Date: 2016-05-01
Image Number: 142881
Caption: "I used to watch CNN back when it was a news network." "Black lives matter Relax white people, they're not here." "Morning Joe has their heads so far up Trump's ass they bumped into Chris Christie." (Live sketch from the White House Correspondents' Dinner.)
     
4. Cartoonist Ann Telnaes  Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons 2016-02-04 they 
Cartoonist(s): Ann Telnaes
Comic/Cartoon: Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2016-02-04 Pub. Date: 2016-02-04
Image Number: 138897
Caption: "They're not giving me very much money now." $675k for speech. (Live sketch from February 4, 2016 Democratic debate.)
     
5. Cartoonist Ann Telnaes  Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons 2016-01-18 they 
Cartoonist(s): Ann Telnaes
Comic/Cartoon: Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2016-01-18 Pub. Date: 2016-01-18
Image Number: 138126
Caption: "Can you really reform Wall St. when they are spending millions and millions of dollars on campaign contributions?" Bernie Sanders.
     
6. Cartoonist Ann Telnaes  Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons 2016-01-07 they 
Cartoonist(s): Ann Telnaes
Comic/Cartoon: Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2016-01-07 Pub. Date: 2016-01-07
Image Number: 137644
Caption: Les Cathos Integristes. Contre le theatre. Charlie Hebdo. 100 coups de fouet, si vous n'etes pas morts de rire! So now the shock of the murders has turned to questioning Charlie Hebdo's satire. Some cartoonists and writers have described the cartoons as anti-Muslim, blasphemous, offensive and bigoted. The 2009 firing of a cartoonist who wrote and anti-Semitic column has also been mentioned ... First of all, I am not a big fan of bathroom humor. Secondly, and more seriously, it's a valid discussion to have about why the divisions between people are so deep and our political discourse have become toxic ... However: That is not what we should be talking about now. The only question we should be asking is: Do we condone threats or violence toward individuals because of what they say or draw, regardless of how offensive the words or images are? NO. Because what happens once we get beyond the easy images to condemn? What?? And who makes that decision? All people must have the right to express themselves without fear otherwise we risk losing all our freedoms. (This cartoon was originally published on 2015-01-13).
     
7. Cartoonist Ann Telnaes  Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons 2015-12-09 they 
Cartoonist(s): Ann Telnaes
Comic/Cartoon: Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2015-12-09 Pub. Date: 2015-12-09
Image Number: 136352
Caption: The Politics of Fear. Politicians have a variety of ways to manipulate your emotions. Props. They know which buttons to push. They appeal to your sense of patriotism. Your morality. Your American pioneer spirit. But the most effective way is through fear. Communism. Socialism. Losing the American way of life. Losing jobs. And the biggest fear of all: Fear of people who look different from you. The only thing we have to fear is our fear mongering politicians ...
     
8. Cartoonist Ann Telnaes  Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons 2015-09-17 they 
Cartoonist(s): Ann Telnaes
Comic/Cartoon: Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2015-09-17 Pub. Date: 2015-09-17
Image Number: 132758
Caption: This is a country where we speak English. I would get along with everyone. Go ahead. Zero. I want to build a wall that works. I know my people. I did great in Atlantic City. Don't make things up Jeb. They're coming from Asia to have babies here. More energy - I like that. We have a lot of bad dudes.
     
9. Cartoonist Ann Telnaes  Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons 2015-06-29 they 
Cartoonist(s): Ann Telnaes
Comic/Cartoon: Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2015-06-29 Pub. Date: 2015-06-29
Image Number: 129201
Caption: Censored. Cite as: 576 U.S. - (2015). Scalia, J., dissenting. Every State violated the Constitution for all of the 135 years between the Fourteenth Amendment's ratification and Massachusetts' permitting of same-sex marriage in 2003. They have discovered in the Fourteenth Amendment a "fundamental right" overlooked by every person alive at the time of ratification, and almost everyone else in time since. They see what lesser legal minds - minds like Thomas Cooley, John Marshall Harlan, Olive Wendall Holmes, Hr., Learned Hand, Louis Brandeis, William Howard Taft, Benjamin Cardozo, Hugo Black, Felix Frankfurter, Robert Jackson, and Henry Friendly - could not. They are certain that the People ratified the Fourteenth Amendment to bestow on them the power to remove questions from the democratic process when is called for by their "reasoned judgment." These Justices know that limiting marriage to one mand and one woman is contrary to reason; they know that an institution as old as government itself, and accepted by every nation in history until 15 years ago, cannot possibly be supported by anything other than ignorance or bigotry. And they are willing to say that any citizen who does not agree with that, who adheres to what was, until 15 years ago, the unanimous judgment of all generations and all societies, stands against the Constitution. The opinion is couched in a style that is as pretentious as its content is egotistic. It is one thing for separate concurring or dissenting opinions to contain extravagances, even silly extravagances, of thought and expression; it is something else for the official opinion of the Court to do so. Of course the opinion's show profundities are often profoundly incoherent. "The nature of marriage is that, through its enduring bond, two persons together can find other freedoms, such as expression, intimacy and spirituality. (Really? Who ever thought that intimacy and spirituality [whatever that means] were freedoms? And if intimacy is, one would think Freedom of Intimacy is abridged rather than expanded by marriage. Ask the nearest hippie. Expression, sure enough, is a freedom, but anyone in a long-lasting marriage will attest that that happy state constricts, rather than expands, what one can prudently say.) Rights, we are told, can "rise ... from a better informed understanding of how constitutional imperatives define a liberty that remains urgent in our own era. (Huh? How can a better informed understanding of how constitutional imperatives [whatever that means] define [whatever that means] an urgent liberty [never mine], give birth to a right?) and we are told that, "[i]n any particular case," either the Equal Protection of Due Process Clause "may be thought to capture the essence of [a] right in a more accurate and comprehensive way, than the other, "even as the two Clauses may converge in the identification and definition of the right. (What say? What possible "essence" does substantive due process "capture" in an "accurate and comprehensive way"? It stands for nothing whatever, except those freedoms and entitlements that this Court really likes. And the Equal Protection Clause, as employed today, identifies nothing except a difference in treatment that this Court ... Obergfell v. Hodges. If, even as the price to be paid for a fifth vote, I never joined an opinion for the Court that began: "The Constitution promises liberty to all within its reach, a liberty that includes certain specific rights that allow persons, within a lawful realm, to define and express their identity." I would hide my head in a bag. The Supreme Court of the United States has descended from the disciplined legal reasoning of John Marshall and Joseph Story to the mystical aphorisms of the fortune cookie.
     
10. Cartoonist Ann Telnaes  Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons 2015-04-23 they 
Cartoonist(s): Ann Telnaes
Comic/Cartoon: Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2015-04-23 Pub. Date: 2015-04-23
Image Number: 126320
Caption: The White House Correspondents' Dinner, also know as the "Nerd Prom" is being held Saturday in Washington DC. Swag bag. The annual dinner first held in the early 1920s was originally a low-key affair, but has now become a Hollywood extravaganza complete with: Multiple pre and post parties. Selfies. Which in and of itself must look ridiculous to people outside the Beltway ... But thin about the more troubling aspect of this - Journalists being chummy with politicians and powerful they are supposed to hold accountable. It's and unhealthy and unethical relationship. Press.
     
11. Cartoonist Ann Telnaes  Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons 2015-01-13 they 
Cartoonist(s): Ann Telnaes
Comic/Cartoon: Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2015-01-13 Pub. Date: 2015-01-13
Image Number: 121968
Caption: Les Cathos Integristes. Contre le theatre. Charlie Hebdo. 100 coups de fouet, si vous n'etes pas morts de rire! So now the shock of the murders has turned to questioning Charlie Hebdo's satire. Some cartoonists and writers have described the cartoons as anti-Muslim, blasphemous, offensive and bigoted. The 2009 firing of a cartoonist who wrote and anti-Semitic column has also been mentioned ... First of all, I am not a big fan of bathroom humor. Secondly, and more seriously, it's a valid discussion to have about why the divisions between people are so deep and our political discourse have become toxic ... However: That is not what we should be talking about now. The only question we should be asking is: Do we condone threats or violence toward individuals because of what they say or draw, regardless of how offensive the words or images are? NO. Because what happens once we get beyond the easy images to condemn? What?? And who makes that decision? All people must have the right to express themselves without fear otherwise we risk losing all our freedoms.
     
12. Cartoonist Ann Telnaes  Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons 2013-02-21 they 
Cartoonist(s): Ann Telnaes
Comic/Cartoon: Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2013-02-21 Pub. Date: 2013-02-21
Image Number: 93947
Caption: No caption. (President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama are smiling and waving. They are surrounded by stoic secret service agents).
     
13. Cartoonist Ann Telnaes  Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons 2012-10-30 they 
Cartoonist(s): Ann Telnaes
Comic/Cartoon: Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2012-10-30 Pub. Date: 2012-10-30
Image Number: 89379
Caption: (In a sketch drawn and posted initially during the third debate of the 2012 presidential election, Barack Obama and Mitt Romney stand opposite each other. They each are speaking and raising their index fingers to the other.)
     
Result page:     (13 images)